let’s roundly shit on everything again

Next up! A list of anticipated SFF titles at Kirkus Reviews.

People actually read this shit and think it’s good. As far as I know, Patricia Briggs appropriates the everloving fuck out of First Nations cultures–hey, those earrings and probably those tattoos on a woman who otherwise looks totally white–and the books are endless rape-a-thon garbage with internalized misogyny, alpha males, and the whole lot (victim-blaming, rapist logic and so on), all typical of the genre.  Yes, I know the protagonist is supposed to be biracial, but the author is white and from critiques I’ve read Briggs’ portrayal of Native culture is pretty much along the line of “white girl puts on a feather headdress for Halloween.” Verdict: recycle the paper, it’s not good for much else.

Brandon Sanderson remains a neckbeard favorite I will never read but whom I’ll always automatically assume is worthless, for reasons previously given. What is this thing anyway? Is it steampunk? What does the title even mean? Verdict: throw it in a bonfire.

Two white teenagers on a YA cover! Riveting, isn’t it? The plot summary mentions everyone over fourteen is dead (?) and that there’s some evil thing called… the Darkness. Really, people read this stuff? Why? Is it a mass lobotomy? Oh right, they’re American, never mind. The author is a very old, very white dude. What more can be said? Verdict: it’s YA, of course it’s fucking shit.

I considered briefly whether the “white” in the title refers to white people, but since it’s YA it probably does in fact feature protagonists who are whitey mcwhite from the clan of white which lives in the land of whiteness.

Madeleine Tully lives in Cambridge, England, the World – a city of spires, Isaac Newton and Auntie’s Tea Shop.

Elliot Baranski lives in Bonfire, the Farms, the Kingdom of Cello – where seasons roam, the Butterfly Child sleeps in a glass jar, and bells warn of attacks from dangerous Colours.

The author is also white! Who wants to bet there will be a tedious heterosexual romance? Verdict: it’s YA, of course it’s fucking shit.

How about Fantasy Bookcafe’s list? Lots of overlap. Let’s open with… more cultural appropriation!

Joy of joys! Guy Gavriel Kay, white dude who can’t write for jack shit, is at it again with fake China. I like the random Chinese on the cover, very Joss Whedon don’t you think, I bet the characters will be obsessed over “saving face” a lot. I’ve read Kay before and he’s never been able to produce anything but overblown prose, overwrought melodrama, and characters that Kay probably think are out of Greek tragedies but which just spring from the imagination of a man who can’t do characterization to save his worthless life. Verdict: die whitey die.

It began for our narrator forty years ago when the family lodger stole their car and committed suicide in it, stirring up ancient powers best left undisturbed. Dark creatures from beyond the world are on the loose, and it will take everything our narrator has just to stay alive: there is primal horror here, and menace unleashed – within his family and from the forces that have gathered to destroy it.

His only defense is three women, on a farm at the end of the lane. The youngest of them claims that her duckpond is an ocean. The oldest can remember the Big Bang.

I’ll predict it now: the narrator is a passive cipher being shunted from point A to point B, is an everyman, and has no personality to speak of. Who wants to bet these three women are some variation of mother, maiden, and crone? They’re some of Gaiman’s favorites since after all he’s basically fucking shit about writing women. “Dark creatures from beyond are on the loose”? Seriously? Is that a drowning woman on the cover? Didn’t we already go over this fetishization of dead women crap and how it’s bad? Verdict: Neil Gaiman’s still writing? Why?

Holy shit, one that doesn’t look utterly terrible! Whatever that elephant is doing.

A proud and reserved alien society finds its homeland destroyed in an unprovoked act of aggression, and the survivors have no choice but to reach out to the indigenous humanoids of their adopted world, to whom they are distantly related. They wish to preserve their cherished way of life but come to discover that in order to preserve their culture, they may have to change it forever.

Now a man and a woman from these two clashing societies must work together to save this vanishing race—and end up uncovering ancient mysteries with far-reaching ramifications. As their mission hangs in the balance, this unlikely team—one cool and cerebral, the other fiery and impulsive—just may find in each other their own destinies . . . and a force that transcends all.

Actually kind of generic, going by the plot summary. But Karen Lord going by previous output, a very short and breezy novel, is a much better author than the rest on this list or Fantasy Faction’s even shittier one. Please don’t let there be a heterosexual romance, disgusting heterosexuals can do their shit behind the door without shoving that in my face, thank you very much. Straight agenda is repulsive. I think this is the only (1, singular) writer of color I’ve seen in these two lists. Verdict: maybe not terrible.

Leave a comment

27 Comments

  1. The elephant means brown people! (No, I don’t know what the hell that thing is doing there either.)

    I did like Guy Gavriel Kay many, many years ago, although I have a feeling that he tends to do better appropriating European medieval culture. “River of Stars” seems to have the “only one chick in Pandaria, er, China was ever educated! Every other woman was golddigging and ignorant!” plot going on.*

  2. elric10

     /  December 31, 2012

    The UK edition of the Karen Lord book has a slightly better cover –

    http://www.jofletcherbooks.com/files/2012/08/Best_of_All_P_Worlds.png

    I’m looking forward to the new Valente book, Six-Gun Snow White and Kit Reed’s The Story Until Now.

  3. elric10

     /  December 31, 2012

    Oh,just remembered,Nalo Hopkinson also has a new book coming out in March called Sister Mine,looking forward to this as well.

  4. To Magpiewhotypes: if you read Kay’s Sailing to Sarantium, aka Byzantium, and you’re from that culture (as I am), you’d know his European appropriations are also far from stellar.

    • I’m judging by Song for Arbonne and that one he wrote about sort-of medieval Spain–Lions of al-Rassan–both of which I read years ago. Apparently he has a small geographic comfort zone. Or he could be a bad writer and I couldn’t tell at the time.

      • tigerpetals

         /  January 1, 2013

        I read and loved Lions years ago, and bought Arbonne, Tigana, and Ysabel on that basis but haven’t read them yet. I’m glad I stayed away from his other stuff, but for the sake of the money spent I hope those are as good as you remember them as. Or at least enjoyable for my tastes.

  5. Postscript: To say nothing of the naked Gary Stuism in that duology. Every woman the talented-commoner protagonist encounters wants to have his babies, and does — even the Empress, who had been thwarted in expressing her maternal instincts. She got to rule the preeminent nation of its time, instead, before becoming awakened to her true role/real nature by the right man.

  6. You might have picked some of the worst, but these lists, by and large, are terrible. I see Max Gladstone, and Kate Elliot, but these were people who have real marketing machines behind them. That makes the mention of Karen Lord’s new book rather interesting. Her first book didn’t get much advertising. Must’ve done well. That is also one of the books that would be published soon. Frankly, from what I see, a big reason why these lists are so bad is because next year isn’t shaping up with very many people who are A-list in my book. I know there is Chris Moriarty and Ghost Spin, and there’s Karen Lord, but who else? Rosemary Kirstein, Laurie Marks? I’ll see their books when they get there… I think it will be mostly be surprises as to anything unexpected…

    • mastadge

       /  December 31, 2012

      Unfortunately I doubt we’ll see new Kirstein or Marks next year. But as mentioned above Nalo Hopkinson has a new book coming out, as does Lauren Beukes. Yoon Ha Lee has a collection coming. Richard Bowes. Cat Valente. Sofia Samatar’s debut is coming. I’m sure we’ll get plenty of good books from Aqueduct, Lethe, Prime, Small Beer and other small presses, and maybe even a few from some of the bigger presses as well.

  7. KJ Bishop has a short story collection coming out. In fact it’s already available on Kindle, though apologies as this may be limited by region…not sure if that’s a barrier. ;-)

    Happy New Year y’all, I look forward to more insight and critiques in the coming year. Thanks to ACM and all the regulars for a very education 2012!

  8. The purity of your hatred remains a beautiful thing. If only you could literally burn these lists instead of figuratively.

  9. the twisted spinster

     /  January 1, 2013

    That Gaiman one looks dire — he needs an editor who will tell him that he’s been writing the same book over and over and it’s going to stop or no more publishing cookies. But he’s a popular white male author so it won’t happen.

    And that description of Karen Lord’s novel is the blandest, most generic thing I’ve seen since the last time I opened a People magazine. Does her publisher want her to fail? The plot of that book — based solely on the blurb — sounds like a generic Star Trek plot — and I mean the original show with William Shatner. If I hadn’t already heard of her reputation I’d have written Karen Lord off as just another hack, again just based on that horrid synopsis. This is why I keep holding back from fully trusting in publishers — they do shit like this all the time.

    Hmm, Guy Gavriel Kay — I think I opened a book of his at Borders or something and there was a line there about a woman who couldn’t play her harp (or whatever) because her “fingers were too sad” because absent male love interest something something. I closed the book and replaced it on the shelf. Then again, it might have been some other author. On the whole I think I’ve been put off mostly by his name, and that twee “special” spelling of “Gabriel.” I don’t care if Gavriel is his real middle name, it’s pretentious as hell.

    • Never read Guy Gavriel Kay but I have to object about his middle name. Apparently he comes from a Jewish background. גבריאל = Gavriel is a common Jewish name and pronouncing it that way is correct. Nothing pretentious about it.

      • Andrea Harris

         /  January 5, 2013

        Hmm, it looked odd betweet “Guy” and “Kay,” and not knowing a thing about him I thought it was a clever, poetical pseudonym.

        • dynamickenparker

           /  January 5, 2013

          Let’s not jump to conclusions about names spelled differently than the Aryan standard.

        • Andrea Harris

           /  January 7, 2013

          The name “Gabriel” isn’t “Aryan” at all, it’s Hebrew. The “b” spelling is simply the most common variant, used in much of the non-English-speaking world (all the Gabriels I knew were Hispanic). I did know that much. What I did not know that Mr Kay was 1) Jewish, 2) Canadian, or 3) that “Guy Gavriel Kay” was his real name — it sounds like such a perfect name for a fantasy author that I thought he’d made part or all of it up.

        • dynamickenparker

           /  January 7, 2013

          Right, I just don’t think it’s good practice to look at unusually-spelled names and assume they’re pretentious or “twee,” especially not knowing the author’s background. It’s obnoxious. I don’t think hemming and hawing about the origin of the name really shows that you get that.

  10. elric10

     /  January 1, 2013

    2013 Worlds Without End Women of Genre Fiction Reading Challenge –

    https://www.worldswithoutend.com/authors_women.asp

    See how many WoC you can spot from this huge list .

  11. elric10

     /  January 1, 2013

    huh,another list of 50 most anticipated SFF books –

    http://www.rantingdragon.com/fifty-fantasy-and-science-fiction-novels-to-look-forward-to-in-2013/

    Out of the 50,only 11 are women and 1 is a WoC (Karen Lord again!!)

    • Mark Newton is, IIRC, half-Indian. He’s also rather aware and really trying to be speculative instead of writing about elves and dragons. I think Drakenfield will be more traditional, but I’m hoping there will be more interesting characters than the ones we often get in SFF.

      I think people making these lists should be looking at is short stories – I think there is so much more diversity in the fiction as well as the authors than that found in mainstream.

      I think Vandermeer and Kiernan have books coming out next year as well.

  12. wow elric10, from the looks of those guys, not much honey for us…

    One book this year, now, that might merit attention is:

    A Stranger In Olondria, by Sofia Samatar

    Another, with some reservations about potential Liberal Jewish Gaze wrt Arabs, is:

    The Golem and the Jinni, by Helene Wrecker

  13. Maybe this is the time to mention that The Other Half of the Sky will be coming out in April: mythic space opera with women protagonists in universes where they’re fully human. TOC with story teasers and link to the cover: http://www.starshipreckless.com/blog/?p=6836

  14. “”Please don’t let there be a heterosexual romance, disgusting heterosexuals can do their shit behind the door without shoving that in my face, thank you very much. Straight agenda is repulsive. “”

    *thumbsup.gif*

  15. Just read Best of All Worlds.

    1) In the Venn Diagram of things, broadly speaking, it’s a romance in a sci-fi setting, so not very far away from what Catherine Asaro does, telepathy included. Although, the romance is between a bubbly geek and Black!Spock, and not quite that standard to the more paranormal romance characters that Asaro does.

    2) This book is relatively breezy as well, tho’ less so than her first. It’s slightly challenging because the tone of the narration keeps changing, so one rotates from one PoV to the other, but different aspects of their “voice” dictate the text. There are no demarcations for waking or dream state either, and dream parts are yet another angle. Looking back, it might reward rereading with more attention.

    3) The woo aspects are in good proportions and good taste, more or less. The editing is tight enough that I was left sorry that it was over. It’s not so crazy dense with goodness like Valente, but there were some parts that are crafted well enough to ring with me. At the end, one realizes another similarity with Kat Richardson besides tight editing.

    At first glance, this is pretty high end junk food genre, in my estimation. Easy to read, and not totally disposable.

  16. Oh, and how could I forget to mention?

    OMG, but the face on the cover does not match *anyone* in the book. Only one beautiful character in the novel, and she’s a minor character.

    The synopsis? OMG. It’s written in some kind of storyboard outline, the quest and “mysteries” aspects are distinctly secondary to other aspects of the novel. Not. Helpful.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: