
Long ago, Susan Rodriguez was Harry Dresden’s lover-until she was attacked by his enemies, leaving her torn between her own humanity and the bloodlust of the vampiric Red Court. Susan then disappeared to South America, where she could fight both her savage gift and those who cursed her with it.
Now Arianna Ortega, Duchess of the Red Court, has discovered a secret Susan has long kept, and she plans to use it-against Harry. To prevail this time, he may have no choice but to embrace the raging fury of his own untapped dark power. Because Harry’s not fighting to save the world…
He’s fighting to save his child.
“His own untapped dark power”? Really? Who wrote this synopsis? Who wrote this book? Who reads this shit, illiterate chimpanzees?
Dreck like this is why I rarely read books by white dudes anymore, by the way.
18” Blasting Rod
My blasting rod was hanging from its tie on the inside of my coat, a stick of oak about eighteen inches long and a bit thicker than my thumb. The ridges of the runes and sigils carved into it felt comfortably familiar under the fingers of my right hand as I drew it out.
Jim Butcher has a deep-seated, burning obsession with Hairy Dickden’s “blasting rod,” one which I’ve been told has been running through all the installments of the series.
It wasn’t until then that I noticed that while my brain had been calmly paddling down the stream of logic, the raging cauldron in my belly had overflowed, and I was walking with smooth, swift strides down a hallway, my staff in my left hand, my blasting rod in my right, and the runes and carvings of both were blazing with carmine light.
One phallic symbol isn’t enough, he needs two–one for each hand! This, my friends, is textbook overcompensation. “Carmine light” is just risible.
The man once wrote: Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger. Tolkien had that one mostly right.
I stepped forward, let the door bang closed, and snarled, “Fuck subtle.”
The gurgle-hissing from around the corner ahead stopped at a confused intersection of speech that needed no translation: Huh?
I lifted the blasting rod, aimed it at the corner ahead of me, and poured my rage, my will, and my power into it as I snarled, “Fuego!”[…]
I dropped the shield almost before he was done rebounding, leveled the blasting rod with a flick of my wrist, and ripped the vampire in half with a word and a beam of silver fire.
Is this a Harry Potter/World of Darkness crossover fanfic, by any chance? Have we discovered the true secret origins of The Dresden Files, EL James style?
That whole “Fuck subtle” and “LOOK AT HOW BADASS I AM” is the sound of a hundred fanboys who wish they could grow up to be like this. A teenage boy’s power fantasy. By a man-child, for other man-children.
I slid to a stop on the rapidly moistening floor, lifted the rod, and cut loose with another blast.
No fucking comment.
Hawt Bangin’ Chicks
my apprentice, Molly, had come in while I was sleeping and was profaning breakfast in my tiny kitchen.
She wore a simple outfit—jeans and a black T-shirt that read, in very small white letters, IF YOU CAN READ THIS, YOU’D BETTER HAVE BOUGHT ME DINNER. Her golden hair was longer—she’d been letting it grow—and hung down to her shoulder blades in back. She’d colored it near the tips with green that darkened to blue as it went down.
I’m not sure if Molly was “bangin’,” or “slammin’,” or “hawt,” since the cultural catchphrase cycles every couple of minutes. But if you picked a word meant to be a term of praise and adoration for the beauty of a young woman, it was probably applicable. For me, the effect was somewhat spoiled, because I’d known her since she was a skinny kid somewhere between the ages of training wheels and training bra, but that didn’t mean that I didn’t have an academic appreciation for her looks. When she paid any attention, men fell all over her.
The only way Jim Butcher could’ve written this without his own skin crawling off would be… well, if this is how he views women in real life. That extra touch of him having known her since she was a child makes it that much creepier. And that t-shirt? So classy. Yes, it’s something worn by a character. A fictional character written by Jim Butcher. He chooses to write her wearing that. This isn’t an independent woman making a clothing choice on her own. Just saying that in case anyone wants to start treating either her or Harry Dresden as real people who lead independent lives which have nothing to do with Butcher’s views or opinions–in case, so to speak, anyone wants to be a giant galloping dolt making a tried and tired argument of no merit whatsoever. Now go eat shit, “devil’s advocates.”
I turned to help Susan out and felt my mouth drop open a little.
Her outfit was . . . um, freaking hot.
The golden headdress was the first thing I noticed. It was decorated with feathers, with jade carved with sigils and symbols like those I had seen on the stone table, and with flickering gems of arctic green and blue. For a second, I thought her vampire nature had begun to rise again, because her face was covered in what I mistook for tattoos. A second glance showed me that they were some kind of precisely drawn design, sort of like henna markings, but far more primitive and savage-looking in appearance. They were also done in a variety of colors of black and deep, dark red. The designs around her dark brown eyes made them stand out sharply.
Under that, she wore a shift of some material that looked like simple, soft buckskin, split on the sides for ease of movement, and her feet were wrapped in shoes made of similar material, also decorated with feathers. The moccasins and shift both were pure white, and made a sharp contrast against the dark richness of her skin, and displayed the smooth, tight muscles of her arms and legs tremendously well.
A belt of white leather had an empty holster for a handgun on one of her hips, with a frog for hanging a scabbard upon it on the other. And over all of that, she wore a mantled cloak of feathers, not too terribly unlike the ones we had seen in Nevada—but the colors were all in the rich, cool tones of the Winter Court: glacial blue, deep sea green, and twilight purple.
She looked at me and said, “I’m waiting for you to say something about a Vegas showgirl.”
It took me a moment to reconnect my mouth to my brain. “You look amazing,” I said.
Her smile was slow and hot, with her dark eyes on mine.
Remember: Susan is a Latina woman. Do I have to spell out why it’s iffy to put her in some kind of “sexy jungle woman” outfit to start with, and double down with the racism by describing the face-paint as “primitive, savage-looking”? Do I? Are you that fucking stupid? Do you have a brain, Jim Butcher? Do you have brains, Jim Butcher fans?
Plus, the writing here is remarkably shit. “Her outfit was, um, freaking hot”–that’s the kind of writing that makes neckbeards jeer at Stephenie Meyer and EL James. Remarkably, no jeering occurs here from that front. Are they under the impression this is somehow literary gold, beyond reproach? Who caved their skulls in? I thought #killallmen wasn’t on yet, are we moving ahead of schedule?
[Arianna] was gorgeous. I don’t mean “cutest girl at the club” gorgeous. I mean that she looked like a literal goddess. The details almost didn’t matter. Tall. Dark hair. Skin like milk, like polished ivory. Eyes as blue as the twilight sky. She wore a gown of red silk, with a neckline that plunged gorgeously. Jewels touched her throat, her ears. Her hair was piled up on her head, occasional loose ringlets falling out. Hers was a beauty so pure that it was nearly painful to behold—Athena heading out on a Friday night.
It took me a good five or six seconds of staring to realize that there was something beneath that beauty that I did not like at all. Her loveliness itself, I realized, was a weapon—such creatures as she had driven men literally insane with desire and obsession. More to the point, I knew that her beauty was only skin-deep. I knew what lurked beneath.
Now, now this is special. It combines the martyred nerd’s frantic desperation to be noticed by the gorgeous “popular girl,” but since she’ll never so much as glance at him he transforms her–in his head–into a raging bitchslutwhore. That beauty, why, it’s only “skin-deep” masking her feminine evil, her disgusting sexual drive. Notice how a woman having a sex drive is immediately villified siren-style, a succubus who’ll “drive men insane” because it’s the woman’s fault, not that the men in question have no self-control. This is misogynistic bullshit spewed from the keyboard of a misogynistic shitstain. If you are from /r/mensrights though, this will read just right. Bitch. Bitchy bitch bitch.
“Harry,” Anastasia said, turning to me. “What you did today was dangerous.”
“I could take the bitch,” I growled.
“There’s no way for us to know how old Arianna is,” she contradicted, “because humanity hasn’t had a written language for that long. Do you understand what I’m saying?”
I pushed my empty glass away with my fingers and said, “I could take the prehistoric bitch.” I looked around the room for a moment and said, “What is this place?”
As you know, Harry, beautiful women who aren’t sexually interested in you are bitches. Bitch! Prehistoric bitch! And “she contradicted”? Really? Who wrote this? Who reads this? Who edited this? Illiterate fungi?
“Maybe you know the monsters, Martin,” Murphy said quietly. “But I know the guy who stops them. And if they don’t return the girl, we’ll make them regret it.” She nodded at me and said, “Let’s go. We can watch Dresden kill the bitch.”
I found myself smiling. Murphy was good people.
Women who call women Harry hates a bitch–the best of all women.
I dropped the wiseacre attitude. The growing force of my anger burned it away. “Taking my kid isn’t impersonal,” I said. “It’s a Kevorkianesque cry for help.”
“Such moral outrage. Yet you are as guilty as I. Did you not slay Paolo’s child, Bianca?”
“Bianca was trying to kill me at the time,” I said. “Maggie is an innocent. She couldn’t possibly hurt you.”
“Then you should have considered that before you insulted me by murdering my grandchild,” she hissed, her voice suddenly tight and cold. “I am patient, wizard. More patient than you could imagine. And I have looked forward to this day, when the consequences of your arrogance shall fall upon both you and all who love you.”
The threat lit a fire in my brain, and I thought the anger was going to tear its way free of my chest and go after her without me.
“Bitch,” I spat. “Come get some.”
Bitch! The only way to insult women Jim Butcher knows.
“Harry!” she said desperately. “Harry! You can’t!”
I turned my face away from her and kept walking.
“Harry, please!” she all but screamed. “This won’t help Maggie!”
It took me a few seconds to work out how to stop walking. I did it, and took a slow breath.
Molly leaned her forehead against my shoulder, panting, her voice shaking. She still held on tight. “Please. You can’t. You can’t go in there like this. They’ll kill you.” I heard her swallow down a mouthful of terror. “If we have to do it this way . . . at least let me veil you.”
From central casting: Hysterical Clinging Female #65.
Susan looked back at me, her eyes streaming her last tears. “Harry, help me,” she whispered. “Save her. Please.”
Everything in me screamed no. That this was not fair. That I should not have to do this. That no one should ever have to do this.
But . . . I had no choice.
I found myself picking Susan up with one hand. The little girl was curled into a ball with her eyes closed, and there was no time. I pushed her from the altar as gently as I could and let her fall to the floor, where she might be a little safer from the wild energies surging through the temple.
I put Susan on the altar and said, “She’ll be safe. I promise.”
She nodded at me, her body jerking and twisting in convulsions, forcing moans of pain from her lips. She looked terrified, but she nodded.
I put my left hand over her eyes.
I pressed my mouth to hers, swiftly, gently, tasting the blood, and her tears, and mine.
I saw her lips form the word, “Maggie . . .”
And I . . .
I used the knife.
I saved a child.
I won a war.
God forgive me.
This is amazing. Susan is fridged–specifically Dickden himself kills her. But do you know what really matters? Harry’s manpain.
Assorted Bullshit
He nodded. “Joking about it. Good. You will need that sense of humor.”
“Why do you say that?”
“Because she is cold, Dresden. She knows wicked secrets Time himself has forgotten. And if she chose you to be her Knight, she has a plan for you.” He nodded slowly. “Laugh whenever you can. Keeps you from killing yourself when things are bad. That and vodka.”
“That some kind of Russian saying?” I asked.
“Have you seen traditional folk dances?” Sanya asked. “Imagine them being done by someone with a bottle of vodka in them. Laughter abounds, and you survive another day.” He shrugged. “Or break your neck. Either way, it is pain management.”[...]
“Da,” he said. Then he reached into his pocket and produced a metal flask. He sipped from it, and offered it to me. “Here.”
“Vodka?”
“Of course.”
Ah, the American way of coding foreignness–by having ‘em foreigners speak weird, stilted English with no contractions. And, being Russian, of course vodka is a Thing. Then we’ve got that random “da,” that being one of the two-three Russian words Anglophones know (the others being “nyet” and “tovarish”).
“Nah. They’re jerks, but they’re not incompetent jerks. No one around here is going to get away with mental buggery for a while.”
“Buggery?” Molly asked.
“Hey, we’re in the United Kingdom. When in Rome.”
You know, buggery. Very English. Remember JM Frey and her “innit”? Americans. Is there a nationality more embarrassing?
There’s an overlap between former fans of Laurell K Hamilton and current fans of Jim Butcher. Often ex-LKH fans will cite, among other things, the misogyny and racism in Anita Blake as the cause (when they aren’t citing “too much repetitive porn”), but that raises the question–what about the misogyny and racism in The Dresden Files? It can’t be the writing, because let’s face it, Jim Butcher is no greater crafter of prose than LKH. It can’t be the creativity; there’s less of that in a Jim Butcher book than there is in a game of Minesweeper, and in fact a game of Minesweeper contains more imagination than everything Butcher’s shat out put together, more competence in coding it, and more literary merit in the numbers that show you how many bombs there are surrounding a given square. Jim Butcher peddles offensive, misogynistic, juvenile power fantasies. LKH peddles more or less the same. Both are hacks of no great merit; arguably certain bits of Anita Blake are better written than “um, freaking hot” or “my blasting rod… moistening floor.”
I’m forced, then, to draw a conclusion that ex-LKH fans who now swear by Jim Butcher are illiterate maggots. Or, well, anyone who swears by rather than at Jim Butcher period. It truly takes an absence of critical thought, a total unfamiliarity with erudite things such as “vaguely decent writing” to profess undying love and fandom for Jim Butcher. And to have read all of the installments without once pausing to consider that it might just be crap of the lowest, most worthless order–well, that takes excessive alcohol, maybe? The kind of amount that murders all brain cells until there’s nothing left but sloshing and intellectually empty fanturd spew. You poke one of them a bit, and out that comes. And, no, uncritical Jim Butcher fans really, really don’t have some sort of literary high ground over uncritical readers of Twilight or Fifty Shades of Gray. Seriously. Stop pretending. You aren’t more educated. You aren’t morally or intellectually superior. You’re as much a lover of excrement as the ones who lap up Meyer and James.
There’s no reason for an intelligent, slightly well-read person over the mental age of twelve to like Jim Butcher. Sorry.
angelrenoir
/ August 28, 2012Why are the popular books always stuffed with Mary Sues and Gary Stus, depending on the author’s gender? Oh wait. They’re writing self inserts. Of course they get all the hot guys and girls and sex and supah speshul awsum powahs. Obviously *seethes*
perich (@perich)
/ August 28, 2012So he called this book “Changes”? What does that say of the other thirteen?
“Jim Butcher IS Harry Dresden IN: Status Quo“
braak
/ September 1, 2012Yeah, it’s weird because actually that’s EXACTLY what the other thirteen books were. I don’t know if that’s a rule when you publish novel series like this, or what, but the subtitle of this one really should have been, “Changes: Finally Some Things Are Going to Happen.”
gefnsdottir
/ August 29, 2012I honestly have no idea why Butcher is describing the blasting rod in such detail when Harry’s HAD IT SINCE THE FIRST BOOK! it’s pretty much a mainstay of his magical arsenal. It would be like writing a book about vampires and finally, after about five books, the author stops and says “Oh, you know these were vampires, right? Just a heads up!”
What really struck me from reading the books (I’ve read to the end of “Dead Beat”) is how Harry is constantly stopping to say “Oh, X is strong and tough, but she’s so cute!” I mean, really, Harry? Did you magically get stuck at the time of your life when your teenage hormones are in overdrive? If you want more books to snark at, btw, check out “The Iron Druid Chronicles” by Kevin Hearne, Atticus is at least as bad in the “teenage hormones in overdrive” department (if not worse). I don’t think it’s coincidence that he’s been called “the logical successor to Butcher and Dresden”.
Inverarity
/ August 29, 2012One of these days I am going to have to read these books.
I can’t believe an editor let “she contradicted” get past. That’s like, writing 101. That’s straight out of the Turkey City Lexicon.
An “academic appreciation.” Right. This reads to me like Butcher/Dresden trying to have his cake and eat it too: “She’s totally hawt and I will describe her hawtness in great detail, but I’m totally not lusting after this girl who was my underage ward, I’m just academically appreciating her hawtness.”
acrackedmoon
/ August 29, 2012I can send you the whole series. :)
Jayaprakash (@jayaprakash_s)
/ August 29, 2012This wannabe-tough spew is supposed to be noir-esque prose? The ghost of Chandler should haunt this hack for the rest of this days.
acrackedmoon
/ August 29, 2012Butcher would love that, though.
Emil Söderman
/ August 29, 2012“Who wrote this synopsis?”
To be fair, most synposes seems to have been written by people who haven’t read the books, using a pre-selected list of words, having a synposis being really weird and strange is hardly unique for Butcher (or even genre work)
Emil Söderman
/ August 29, 2012“As you know, Harry, beautiful women who aren’t sexually interested in you are bitches.”
Well, it’s not just that, women who are sexually interested in Harry are bitches as well!
“I honestly have no idea why Butcher is describing the blasting rod in such detail when Harry’s HAD IT SINCE THE FIRST BOOK! ”
This one actually makes a bit of (commercial, if not aristic) sense. He basically does a quick recap of the basics of the book so even an illiterate monkey can figure out what is going on. In EVERY. SINGLE. BOOK.
It’s very, very annoying. But it’s presumably help people who start reading mid-stream. Very common in a certain kind of low-budget series-writing.
“I can send you the whole series. :)”
I could have too, but I just cleaned out my cartloads of stuff, so it’s now somewhere at a Red Cross store.
mastadge
/ August 29, 2012My favorite in the quick recap department was Brian Lumley, whose Necroscope novels I read, oh, probably in the early 90s: as I recall, his recaps quickly grew to dozens of pages that were repeated, practically verbatim, in each new novel. It was painful. Why someone didn’t suggest a glossary or a “story so far” prelude is beyond me.
modernwizard
/ August 29, 2012“I found myself picking Susan up with one hand.”
He just awoke to consciousness to discover that he was killing someone? That’s just about as big an abdication of responsibility as the passive voice.
braak
/ August 30, 2012You know, I read these books, and I know I enjoyed them — starting from when I was maybe about 20, is that right? — I even remember responding pretty positively to Changes. But now I’m looking at these excerpts and I just…I don’t know what I was thinking at all.
It’s kind of like, imagine if you had a puppy who grew up into a big slobbery dog that chewed on the furniture and tracked mud all of the floor and was otherwise gross and kind of annoying, but you still sort of love him? Then you spend a year away at college and come home of course there’s still a lot of affection for the dog. As long as he stays outside.
Aliette de Bodard (@aliettedb)
/ August 30, 2012I was reading the wikipedia summary of this and previous episode Death Masks, and it has this little gem:
“[Susan] is nearly driven mad by the scent of the blood, dripping from [Harry's] wounds. To save his life, Dresden magically binds Susan and has sex with her in order to quell her hunger.”
Magically-justified rape!
magpiewhotypes
/ August 30, 2012Leaving consent issues aside, how on earth would sex keep a vampire from wanting blood? Don’t vampires use blood as nourishment? It’s like as if I were lying in a hospital bed, starving and thirsty, and somebody told me that a good fuck would keep me from needing an IV.
This sounds suspiciously similar to the sex magic that Laurel K. Hamilton has in her books.
acrackedmoon
/ August 30, 2012And yet! Butcher fans praises him to the sky while making fun of LKH.
acrackedmoon
/ August 30, 2012ಠ_ಠ
Impressively gross.
Dotan Dimet (@dotandimet)
/ August 30, 2012Just as you’ve managed to encapsulate my entire cultural world* with the term “neckbeard”, I think you’ve summarized the whole Harry Dresden series with the term “nerd martyrdom”.
There. Done.
One of the “things” the Dresden books are “about” is the power fantasy of not having sex with hot and willing women because of being either too busy saving the world or too “noble”. In the book Proven Guilty, Harry pours cold water on the aforementioned Molly as she kneels naked before him, then lectures her about being a whiny teenager and packs her off to her estranged parents. Not having sex with his friends’ vulnerable teen daughter is something even Tony Soprano might manage; feeling morally superior while sexually humiliating her – ugh.
“Moistening floor” indeed.
* – (Conan, Alan Moore, Linux, everything in between)
saajanpatel
/ August 30, 2012“Her outfit was, um, freaking hot”
…..what is this? I remember people making fun of the “repressed housewives” that liked 50 Shades but the truth is based on your excerpts it seems that at best these books are equal in quality.
I actually pointed this out to people, that there is enough bad dialogue and poorly written work in SFF that 50 Shades would come out, IMO, only slightly below average.
saajanpatel
/ August 30, 2012There’s also an interesting thing to note -> IMO, 50 shades’s Christian is pretty much an SFF Gary Stu save his power is money. Same manpain, same hotness.
So the major difference seems to positioning the character as a romantic partner for straight women as opposed to the self insert for a straight male.
acrackedmoon
/ August 30, 2012Excellent point. Jim Butcher–uh, Harry Dresden is the guy every neckbeard wants to be; Christian Gray is the evil “bad boy” who “steals” women from neckbeards, who are eternal Nice Guys in the perpetual friendzone.
redclause
/ September 13, 2012dear god, I hate this series, I hate it more then Twilight and Anita Blake BECAUSE people refuse to see just how insulting and so very, very self-insert the main character is.
One of the things that really annoys me is, not just the sexism and ethnic stereotypes, but the heavy dose of rape culture in these books and the nice guy justifications pasted on. It’s okay for the hero to have sex with an unwilling women if it saves her life, or it was okay at the time because he didn’t know she was under a magic roofy, hence we won’t even bring it up again. And then of course theres-
(1) The fact only lesbians are shown in these books and not gay men. Save of course when Harry pretended to be gay in the most offensive way possible. It says alot when I can remember five counts of girl on girl, I guess Jimmy knows who his target audience is.
(2) Butcher uses third wave feminism as an excuse to ‘make his female characters sexy.’ Because as long as they can kick a guys ass he’s allowed to dress them up and detail their boobs every chance he gets. This annoys me because fans use this as an excuse so much when someone points out of crappy the female characters are.
(3) Butcher is a Joss Wheadon story teller, emotionally manipulative to the damn core. He makes Harry’s life hell so he has an excuse to make his main character over powered and ‘badass.’ Not to mention Dresdens messiah complex. Is noble and pure and over comes temptation? Check. Is a white knight and a protector of women? Check. CAME BACK FROM THE FUCKING DEAD. check. He also thinks he’s smart by pointing out fantasy world tropes but follows so many action hero ones it’s down right funny.
and finally
(4) Thomas fucking Raith and the White court! I don’t like Thomas Raith Jim, stop trying to make him likeable and tragic when he rapes people to death and decided this was okay once he was ‘forced’ to do it under torture. A good writer could pull it off but you can’t.
haha…wow this was long. Sorry I went into rant mode but I never get to vent about this series much.
vaiyt
/ February 8, 2013“(2) Butcher uses third wave feminism as an excuse to ‘make his female characters sexy.’ Because as long as they can kick a guys ass he’s allowed to dress them up and detail their boobs every chance he gets.”
Also known as: Joss Whedon Feminism. Or: “what do you MEAN waif-fu is not progressive enough?”
leanansidhe363
/ March 26, 2013“Now, now this is special. It combines the martyred nerd’s frantic desperation to be noticed by the gorgeous “popular girl,” but since she’ll never so much as glance at him he transforms her–in his head–into a raging bitchslutwhore. That beauty, why, it’s only “skin-deep” masking her feminine evil, her disgusting sexual drive. Notice how a woman having a sex drive is immediately villified siren-style, a succubus who’ll “drive men insane” because it’s the woman’s fault, not that the men in question have no self-control. This is misogynistic bullshit spewed from the keyboard of a misogynistic shitstain. If you are from /r/mensrights though, this will read just right. Bitch. Bitchy bitch bitch.”
Huh…
While I don’t agree with you, I think there is something to this paragraph that is interesting. You managed to do more disservice to the character of Arianna Ortega than to Dresden himself. See, Arianna IS a monster. An incredibly powerful Red Court vampire, in fact, with several centuries of combat and human-hunting in her resume.
He doesn’t transform her into anything in his mind. He’s acknowledging her for exactly what she is, which is an incredibly dangerous opponent, well worth fear and caution. Whereas, you’re description of her completely bypasses the most noteworthy parts of her character and instead delegates her to the pretty-face corner of the room. It’s as if you’re saying she can’t be dangerous because she’s pretty and by Dresden commenting on the very real danger she represents to him, he’s somehow doing her a bad turn when in fact he’s showing her a lot more respect than you are.
“As you know, Harry, beautiful women who aren’t sexually interested in you are bitches. Bitch! Prehistoric bitch! And “she contradicted”? Really? Who wrote this? Who reads this? Who edited this? Illiterate fungi?”
And here we are again, with you completely bypassing an aspect of this character in order to raise her up (because she’s pretty) and to demonize Dresden for acknowledged the fact that she’s a hundred thousand year old monster well beyond his capabilities to beat. Hell, if I was going to bitch about something in that passage it would have been Dresden’s stupid male bravado in thinking he could take on a creature that powerful. And what is this shit about her being sexually interested in him or not? Not once in this passage or any before does he make any reference to wanting her, sexually. And since he didn’t make an advance for her to reject, I think it’s pretty bullshit of you to imply that any man who gives credence to a woman’s beauty wants to fuck her.
“This is amazing. Susan is fridged–specifically Dickden himself kills her. But do you know what really matters? Harry’s manpain.”
Well, yeah. The book is written from his perspective. He just killed the woman he loved and the mother of his child. It’s not like we could see through anyone else’s eyes. It’s a pretty dark moment in the book, probably the darkest. I don’t really see a legitimate bitch here.
I know I’m going to get mocked, spammed and called a number of anatomically incorrect things for this, but hell, ’tis the power of internet anonymity. I don’t write this out of undying love for Jim Butcher, I’m not a fan boy though I do think he’s a fun read and I actually really enjoy most of his characters. I enjoy Oreos, too. We all have our junk food, even for the brain. I just think you tend to lay far more into the sexism than the passages you selected. You don’t give the female characters the credit they deserve, you ignore half their character traits to fit them into this idea you have of how Jim Butcher supposedly sees women, but in doing so you strip them of all the self-reliant and independent characteristics they exhibited to begin with. Really just going by this article alone, it seems like if anyone over-sexualizes and demeans the female characters of this story, it’s you more than him.
acrackedmoon
/ March 26, 2013Do you also see a facebook post going “Oreos are shit,” fume over it for fifteen months, and come back to it with an epic-length, illiterate screed about how Oreos are the best and how dare anyone not like Oreos?
Just wondering.
leanansidhe363
/ March 28, 2013Epic-length, illiterate, defender of the dubious honor of tasty cookies. Yep, sounds about right.
…
Well, glad we had this talk.
justincaynon
/ March 29, 2013It seems to me like in a lot of instances this is taken too far. I’ve read over some posts on here that raise really good points, but there are some points that aren’t just disagreeable–they’re problematic. You almost seem to hate whites, this coming from an American black man. You seem to have no problem pointing out problems with white women, how white men shouldn’t write books and the like. Then you turn around and cast light on others for being racist.
Part of racial equality is being equal. While we’re far from equal and people are hardwired to notice and take stock of race in this country, I think it’s wrong to be racially insensitive back to whites who a lot of the time don’t realize they’re even being insensitive.
If it’s not from a place of maliace you can talk to them and at least see how they react. If they react badly and attack you, then it’s okay to act a fool on them. Believe me I have done it enough when complaints about some female turned from standard complaints to someone saying she should be raped with a red hot pipe.
Those kind of men are beyond reproach and should be attacked outright.
This is just average wish fulfillment writing. And to be honest a lot of men have never read Fifty Shades, one of the large issues men have with it is that it’s Romance. There’s no other plot there. Everything is relationship based. I think that the fact that female books have to be relationship based and have to be about love or boys is far more damning than Dresden.
Hell, I was told that my book idea about a college aged girl and her two friends trying to raise a newly crowned incarnation of Death wouldn’t work because there was no love interest for the main character and no love story. No mention of the main plot, just needs more love.
acrackedmoon
/ March 29, 2013Do you have a reddit account?
justincaynon
/ March 29, 2013Nope, only ever read one thing on reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/thanksobama
acrackedmoon
/ March 29, 2013Oh yeah, reddit loves Obama, seeing that he’s an unrepentant mass murderer and child-killing war criminal.
estraventherem
/ April 24, 2013I think a lot of the criticism levelled at The Dresden Files for its depiction of women is justified. I enjoy the books for the basic storytelling and, because I’m interested in the plot twists and the fantasy universe, I’m willing to put up with the less-than-brilliant writing style. Like another commenter described it, The Dresden Files is like junk food, a guilty pleasure. It really annoys me that main male characters in the series can be found anywhere on the attractiveness scale (balding and chubby, plain looking, honest-faced, skinny and wiry, attractive, succubus hot)… Whereas all main female characters are either ugly monsters or drop dead gorgeous/cute. (Often drop dead gorgeous monsters)
That said, I don’t think Harry Dresden’s views are necessarily representative of the author’s. Harry’s sexist views are often subverted. For example, he often falls in the trap of underestimating female characters and assuming they are more helpless or naive than he imagined. This a trap of his own making, and his enemies often take advantage of it. He is berated for it by his friends, female and male. If Jim Butcher really is as misogynistic as Harry, why does he consistently ridicule him for his outdated and sexist views?
If it matters, I’m neither white nor male, but instead mixed Asian female without neckbeard.
layogenic
/ April 27, 2013“If Jim Butcher really is as misogynistic as Harry, why does he consistently ridicule him for his outdated and sexist views?”
In short, because Harry Dresden is a hero.
In long, because while Harry Dresden is occasionally brought to task for his skewed perceptions of gender (I really don’t think it’s “often” but I guess that’s heavily subjective–it’s definitely not “consistent” though) Harry is not a bad guy, by the narrative’s POV. Since the books are written narrowly from Harry’s perspective, we only get his internal reactions to being called out, and those are generally of the “aren’t they overreacting?” sort. So it feels less like Harry’s views are being subverted than like Jim Butcher’s view is being explained through Harry’s reaction to it. Like, come on, we’re fighting vampires here, why are we worried about sexism? And then Harry wins the day again, hooray, which carries the idea that he is the good guy, which conflates every thing he does with being good. The books are definitely not deep or critical enough to hedge bets on “flawed hero” sorts of analyses. And he’s not even an antihero so that’s not an out, either.
Justin G (@ActualJustinG)
/ May 1, 2013Way to take everything completely out of context.