my trouble with urban fantasy heroines and beating them at their own game

Do you want to hear about my grudge with urban fantasy? No? Too bad. YOU WILL HEAR ABOUT IT ANYWAY. AGAIN. AND AGAIN. 

There may be individual examples which qualify as such, but I don’t believe UF as a genre is inherently subversive and pro-feminist. Its primary tropes rely on the old idea that only one type of female strength may be validated and recognized: physical power, violence, and a willingness to kill. Relationships with men define the urban fantasy heroine, primarily romantic and sexual, but also in other ways–when push comes to shove it is a man she will turn to (Anita Blake with Edward, Sookie Stackhouse with all the men) for assistance and back-up. She seeks patriarchal approval by striving toward being “one of the boys,” and almost mandatorily breaks down–emotionally or physically–such that she must lean on a man’s shoulder figuratively or otherwise to get back up (Anita Blake and the first time she has sex with Jean-Claude). She associates minimally with other women, and often dismisses women less physically inclined as simpering airheads, women less sexual as prudes, and women more sexual as evil sadistic sluts who compete with her for male attention. In the career of a UF heroine, she will almost inevitably direct gendered slurs at other women: bitch, skank, whore and slut are perennial favorites. She excels because she stands tall as an exception among her gender, elevated above all other women.

Far from being a feminist icon, the typical UF heroine is an iteration of Irene Adler, who in Doyle’s narrative is said to possess “the face of the most beautiful of women and the mind of the most resolute of men.”

Now we take that idea–that the only kind of strength is found in being physically fit, being violent, being one of the boys–and we go all the way.

Meet Commander Shepard.

What does Commander Shepard get to do? She punches in the face people who annoy her. She commits mass murder and/or genocide. She saves galaxies. She’s the first human ever inducted into the super-special agency that polices the entire universe. She gains the respect of warrior frog aliens by headbutting them. She yells at people and pokes them in the chin with the business end of a gun. She gives inspirational speeches to her crew before they head into certain death. All these she does without apology; all these she does without requiring a tender moment to “balance” her out (unless the player chooses to, and even then she doesn’t have the kind of meltdowns many UF protagonists do; certainly Shepard doesn’t require a man’s shoulder to cry on). She can be bloodthirsty and ruthless without requiring a collection of stuffed penguins, an insecurity in her looks, or an inability to cook to “round her out.” The narrative does not apologize for her being the way she is and for the things she does. She is afraid of little, and the question of sexual threat never arises.

More than a power fantasy this is a fantasy of empowerment, the one that even today’s young girls don’t get growing up, because YA heroines–Katniss, Katsa–are just as constrained by their gender (that’s when they aren’t being dead or suicidal) as Mercy Thompson and Eugenie Markham,* not least because they are obliged by genre expectations to fall in love with boys, and to be emotionally vulnerable.

*Both of whom have been subjected to sexual assault. Likewise with Anita Blake and Sookie Stackhouse, to name two. Eugenie falls pregnant from her rape; at the moment of confrontation her ability to take revenge is taken away from her–one of her love interests (all male of course) delivers the killing blow. Anita’s rapist becomes one of her favorite lovers.

Commander Shepard kissing blue alien chick while things explode

Shepard is also, oddly enough, surrounded by women: soldiers, mercenary operatives, engineers, doctors. She can make friends with them, get drunk with them, and a few of them she can actually court (eventually sex up, yes). While Shepard is certainly exceptional–she is a conduit for wish-fulfillment after all–she’s not so incredibly exceptional that all other women pale in comparison. Miranda Lawson, unfortunate lingering ass-shots aside, is an elite operative of a ruthless paramilitary organization. Samara is revered among her people as an agent of holy justice. Liara has a doctorate, is a powerful biotic, and runs a galactic information-brokering network. On and on. The Normandy is crewed with a great many exceptional women.

Lt. Commander Ashley Williams

Now I have zero illusions that Drew Karpyshyn, lead writer of the first two games, is some kind of excellent feminist ally. He after all wrote this stinker where all the female characters are breezily written out, killed off, or infantilized. Samara wears a cleavage-bearing outfit and stiletto heels despite being a celibate warrior-monk; Miranda Lawson’s costume is so tight even one of the blue alien chicks feels pressed to ask “Does Cerberus really let you whore around in that outfit?” The writers’ and designers’ priorities are transparent, and they all have to do with pandering to the male gaze. But they could hardly write two different scripts, one for Commander Shepard and one for her male doppelganger. Certainly if she were not taken seriously by her superiors and subordinates while the doppelganger is, there would have been a PR disaster easily equaling the current and ongoing one over the series finale. The medium of the videogame moreover operates to deliver instant gratification; Shepard needs to shoot explosively, set people on fire hotly, or vanguard-charge at everything definitively while showing no fear or remorse. Her squadmates look to her to lead, inspire, and help them make life-changing decisions because it’s all part of the gratification/power fantasy package of the blockbuster format. There isn’t much room for introspection or weakness, and infinitely more room for choices, such that even the pursuit of romance  is absolutely optional and never takes over the plot. As Jacob Taylor remarks, Shepard’s “real love” is the Normandy.

Regardless of the player’s choices the commander is much more respectable than the likes of Anita Blake, Rachel Morgan, Sookie Stackhouse or the rest of the UF clone factory: she acts, and is treated exactly like, any male action hero–while, importantly, still maintaining relationships (if not especially nuanced ones) with other women. It’s again a matter of pure coincidence due to script parity and the medium, but simply by writing a narrative where a woman is treated no differently than a man you can get a result that’s astonishingly pro-feminist. It doesn’t say anything profound about being a woman, it doesn’t deal with misogyny, it doesn’t allow much exploration into women as mothers or politicians or women in the domestic sphere. But it takes on the popular action narrative on its own terms; it plays a limited game with limited rules–a narrow definition of strength, an arena where only larger-than-life heroics count–but it plays this game so much better than the majority of urban fantasy ever will. It’s a story of how an action heroine’s gender does not hinder her narrative, make her a hyper-sexualized icon of impossible poses and proportions (see: urban fantasy cover art), or stop her from relating to other women.

Shepard may have many things to fear, but losing the romantic attention of the men around her, being raped, and reviling other women as her romantic competition simply aren’t just on her menu. And all the UF heroines would need to do to match her is for their writers to shake off the shackles of escapism, and achieve actual escape.

Leave a comment

36 Comments

  1. the twisted spinster

     /  March 23, 2012

    I haven’t read much urban fantasy — it doesn’t appeal to me — but it seems to be a very American genre. I see these common American cultural beliefs in the genre: the city not as a place of high civilization where the country’s intellectual elite come together, but as a kind of manufactured extension of the untamed forest, full of bloodthirsty wild animals (in actual fact wild animals don’t run around killing other animals for the lulz), and so on; heroines are all Daddy’s girls, who idolize their fathers and look upon their mothers (if they even have living mothers — a way to get rid of mother and her weakness-causing female influence is to kill her off) with contempt or indifference; female heroines are also supposed to be tomboys, that is, frontier women, strong enough to hold off the Indians or werewolves or whatever threatens the homestead until the Man (daddy figure boyfriend) returns home. Then she’s supposed to hang up her rifle/bow/sword/athame, put on a frilly dress, and be a Good Wife.

    • acrackedmoon

       /  March 25, 2012

      heroines are all Daddy’s girls, who idolize their fathers and look upon their mothers (if they even have living mothers — a way to get rid of mother and her weakness-causing female influence is to kill her off) with contempt or indifference

      Yes! Isn’t it funny how, if the dad is the dead one, the heroine will still pine for the dad and seemingly take no influence from her mom whatsoever? Same with heroes for that matter. It’s why Sedia’s Heart of Iron is so striking.

  2. trevoresque

     /  March 23, 2012

    “My Shepard” is always a woman, as I find her voice much easier to imagine as my own. Hearing the male voice actor kills my immersion. Though I identify as male, so many male videogame protagonists feel totally alien to me. Mass Effect is my favourite comfort space opera power fantasy.

    P.S. The ending truly was a jarring disappointment for me. Just putting it out there.

  3. I also detest “feminist” (if only) UF and/or YA for the reasons you outline plus several more. Commander Shepard sounds like Cherryh’s renegade fleet Captain Signy Mallory (in Downbelow Station and other Union/Alliance novles) and she’s also what Admiral Helena Cain could/should have been in the disappointing, regressive Battlestar Galactica reboot.

  4. This reminds me when my friend noted how Mina in the League Movie was changed so she had super vampire powers – she ran the team (which included various violent men) without them in Alan Moore’s comic.

    In my friend’s (sarcastic) words: “Because of course a woman can’t lead men without having super powers.”

  5. Shepard is aces, and +1 to all of this.

    Also, thanks for not talking about Jack, the Dark and Troubled Strong Woman cliche whose pains can only be cured with the healing power of ManShep’s cock.

    At least in ME3 that side mission redeems her as an abrasive den-mother to a litter of naive young space magicians, er, i mean biotics.

    • acrackedmoon

       /  March 24, 2012

      Oh I was going to, but I like to pretend mShep doesn’t exist.

      • yeah, mShep blands things up just by existing.

        On rereading your post – I am beginning to suspect Jack would light up a UF Heroine Bingo card.

        • acrackedmoon

           /  March 25, 2012

          I am beginning to suspect Jack would light up a UF Heroine Bingo card.

          Oh heh, now that you mention it. Yes.

  6. Heh. I really have trouble being an ass in games. (I usually do a renegade/evil playthrough just because I want to see everything, but I really have to force myself to do so)

  7. This is an interesting perspective on female Shepard and I think your analysis of how she came to be is spot on (medium limitations), but I’d be curious to know what you make out of everything else to be found in the games, because I’ve found a lot of it to be questionable, rife with reductionist fetishism and outright distasteful, namely when it comes to the sexual politics, whilst passing itself off as progressive.

    • acrackedmoon

       /  March 27, 2012

      Oh, I think Samara’s outfit, Miranda’s outfit and lingering ass-shots (still present in ME3!), Jack’s outfit and her “broken bird” romance complete with that creepy sex scene–all that is absolutely reprehensible. They are also proof that Bioware didn’t exactly go in with a feminist intent, and proof that Shepard is very much pure accident.

  8. neverendingcatparade

     /  April 8, 2012

    I’d go so far as to say that urban fantasy, or at least the paranormal romance offshoot of it that is overtaking the scifi/fantasy bookshelves these days, may be inherently regressive and anti-feminist. At least in the stories I’ve read so far, the female leads are almost always normal or almost-normal young human women and the male leads are almost always older, stronger, more powerful supernatural creatures. The bad behavior of the male leads is excused as part of their vampire/werewolf/whatever-ness, but if you take that away, all that’s left is a story that normalizes and romanticizes stalking, domestic violence, and male domination over women. I can’t tell you how many UF novels I’ve wanted to hurl through a wall…

  9. Alright, looks like there are peeps who need a proper listmania for good power fantasies!

    These are the authors that deliver some of the good stuff…
    Lynne Benedict
    Anthony Francis
    Jess Battis
    DD Barant (tho’ I am certain I will be entertained by bloghost reaction, yay or nay)
    Jo Anderton
    Kit Whitfield
    Liz Williams (Inspector Chen)
    Barbara Hambly (Windrose)

    Bloghost might like JA Pitts, John Ridley (Those Who Walk In Darkness/What Fire Cannot Burn), mebbe TA Pratt

    • acrackedmoon

       /  April 9, 2012

      I’ve heard of JA Pitts and do mean to pick up his things at some point, on account of them being the only urban fantasy I know of to feature lesbians. Him being a dude does bother me slightly, though, but I guess it is possible he is not skeevy about portraying female homosexuality.

    • Of that list, I really wasn’t impressed by anyone other than Jes Battis. But even in that book the boyfriend was a bit problematic in that “oh noes! I am Le Vampyre! and old and I got plots man, lots of plots” kind of way.

      The conceit behind the Sin and Shadows books are interesting…until you get to the love interest and the God of Justice and all that rigamarole. I didn’t really enjoy it.

      Everyone else was a bit forgettable for me.

      I did enjoy T.A. Pratchett’s Marla Mason series. There is also a series by Cameron Haley called Mob Rules that was enjoyable. In both, the romance is toned down or disposed of relatively quickly. It’ll probably be brought back in Cameron’s Haley’s series, but it wasn’t an over-the-top “our love is forever kind and then also so much angst that I cry tears of blood” of situation. It just was there and was a bit of a plot point, but other things were going on to make it not so prominent. I also enjoyed Mark del Franco’s Laura Blackstone series.

      But, as with most things, your mileage may vary. I think the main thing common to all three of the above series is that there isn’t too much romance, there really isn’t a wise sage male figure, and the women don’t mystically have power until they don’t.

  10. For my money, Anthony Francis delivers better LesYay!, with a compelling (to me) ex of a bisexual character, than JA Pitts. Of course, they are both crushed by Ekaterina Sedia’s House of Discarded Dream. Best Lesbian romance, evah, but then, that is out of a smaller sample of books with lesbian protagonists (or major lesbian characters).

  11. Liked Cameron Haley and couldn’t stand Mark Del Franco!

    One thing I’d like to say about mileage is that I read these things almost as potato chips. You know they’re stupid, I know they’re stupid, but I do appreciate a better brand of stupid.

    • Oh, I do not like Mark del Franco’s Un-whatever series. I didn’t enjoy his male protagonist, but I can see the trouble with Laura Blackstone.

      “You know they’re stupid, I know they’re stupid, but I do appreciate a better brand of stupid.”

      Also, hah, yeah! Your miles may vary indeed! But, yes, agreed. :)

  12. greenknight01

     /  April 13, 2012

    I see the kick-ass heroine of today as a direct continuation of the sassy heroine of Romances past.

    Both are forward, do well in the male sphere, are admire by men… but their story arc involves getting into trouble for being too forward, and needing a man to sort things out.

    Everything is ramped up: instead of riding out on her own and making mildly off-colour quips the heroine is a thoroughly modern and independent type; instead of a nobleman in their fourties or fifties it’s a vampire or werewolf who is several hundred years old (but the power dynamic remains the same), but you have the same plot events where the heroine unwisely gets into danger and needs to be rescued, and the moment where order is restored and she accepts the authority of the older male because of *course* he knows more than she does and he’s stronger and all of that, so that in the end, she’s a) his price (and often lifted onto a pedestal) and b) thoroughly trapped on that pedestal: all that sassyness/kickarse behaviour will in the future refer to his greater wisdom and operate under constraints he imposes.

    But, really… nothing has changed in essence from where I’m sitting.

    • acrackedmoon

       /  April 14, 2012

      Both are forward, do well in the male sphere, are admire by men… but their story arc involves getting into trouble for being too forward, and needing a man to sort things out.

      My problem with the “feisty girl” stock type in a nutshell. She’s allowed to be bold, but harmless: she may spit insults at the man, but she can only “harm” him–like land a punch or slap–only if he “lets” her. It’s very patronizing. Should write that up at some point.

    • she accepts the authority of the older male because of *course* he knows more than she does and he’s stronger and all of that

      You hit the nail on the head. All YA “heroines” basically fit this.

  13. ^ I think there’s a tendency in romance stories (aimed at both genders) to make the “love interest” in some sense “superior” to the protagonist. (I think you might even call it one of the defining features of the “romance genre” as opposed to just a love story) I think the reasoning for that is pretty obvious (romances being wish-fulfillment stories and people not having a very high opinion of themselves)

    Which isn’t to say that’s not something that affects the genders differently ofc.

    • Superior until, of course, the protagonist discovers the secret, terrible weakness that lets him manipulate her into bed heal her as a person.

    • After that she’s screwed over and then blamed for not being smart enough in the first place.

    • acrackedmoon

       /  April 14, 2012

      Generally though, if that’s the case then the man usually becomes more powerful, worthier, and often superior to the woman he’s been romantically pining for. See the nobody boy pining for the princess discovering that he is a lost prince and becomes a king by the end of the story at which point he has greater social status than she and wields greater power, e.g. Aragorn.

      • Yes, it’s usually played like this in fiction. The ‘elevated’ dude gets the good stuff along with some explanation that makes his claims legitimate. Then he’s safely for the girl remains decent for the rest of the book. A less obvious case would be Hermione&Ron. They may remain together forever by the power of authorial intent, but in RL I expect some sort of a screw up a few years down the road. Not that these screw ups are not depicted in fiction – for instance, in crime dramas women may be killed for their money and such – but they always happen in some _other_ stories. The original one emanates a major message about security of these situations, which is I think is very misleading.

    • tigerpetals

       /  July 15, 2012

      I keep making comments to old posts, but yes. This is why romance bothers me. I used to read it and a lot of romance fanfic too, and this is what ultimately bothers me more than the other tropes, if partly because it’s the most consistent one.

  14. Generally though, if that’s the case then the man usually becomes more powerful, worthier, and often superior to the woman he’s been romantically pining for. See the nobody boy pining for the princess discovering that he is a lost prince and becomes a king by the end of the story at which point he has greater social status than she and wields greater power, e.g. Aragorn.

    That’s pretty much every single Brandon Sanderson novel. (Yeah, yeah. He’s a guilty pleasure. Strictly mid-range epic fantasy, but fun and non-grimdark. But the princess/Mary Sue always falls for a much less powerful man, who then turns into a god or something.)

  15. I fell in love. OK kidding but you explained exactly why I hate UF with female leads. I only read UF with male leads with minimal romance or none. I’m a bit extreme I guess :) I don’t read fantasy for romance for crying out loud! I think those big breasted UF are for males? Because I certainly don’t like them.

    • acrackedmoon

       /  April 27, 2012

      Eh, I’m not so hot on UF with male protagonists either–they tend to be just as boring and formualic, just in a different and often out-and-out chauvinistic way (see: Dresden Files).

  16. I understand what you mean though. I can’t read Drersden Files. No matter how famous it is, it’s just horrible to read and boring to boot. Have you tried Rob Thurman’s Cal Leandros series? Or Iron druid series. It’s a bit hard to explain. I like male leads that are not stereotypical assholes? :D

  17. This might be exactly the kind of post that convinces a friend of mine to play the damn series. I would like to point out however that even Male-Shep can be a quite unconventional male figure, at least compared to the average action hero. If you play it as a Paragon (and it seems to me you are much more of a Renegade player), he’s much less of a machoman. As Garrus puts it “You are something rare in the Galaxy, Shepard: a peacemaker”. You can end centuries old animosities and conflicts, instead of genociding you can STOP genocide and you can ally yourself with oppressed species and help them in their struggles(they actually do most of the work, but being at historical crossroads and a very powerful agent you can significantly influence events).
    And most of all, you can show empathy without undermining yourself. The second and third chapter paragon interrupts are all about standing up at the right time and doing the right thing, being it giving a hug to a friend who just found out a terrible secret about her father, defending a synthetic ally (and FRIEND) from biochauvinism, showing gratitude to another friend and peacemaker (Wrex, hope you kept him alive) etc.

  1. Aliette de Bodard » Blog Archive » Weekend brief update
  2. >>Nostalgia For Infinity - Linkfest: March 6th – March 25th

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: