Goodreads has done a round-up of their 2011 readers’ choices votes or whatever it is.
It is a veritable showcase of bad taste and the lowest common denominator.
Consider, for example, the “Travel/Outdoors” section.

Do you see what I see?
- white man goes to Nepal and helps little children! Look at white man, is he not magnificent and virtuous? Why yes he is! Oh yes he is.
- white man tries to “re-create (sic) the original expedition to Machu Picchu.” Awww, isn’t that cute.
- white girl travels to South America and learns things about life. Deep, man, deep.
- white man’s “blow-by-blow account of [...] trip across Europe, the former Soviet Republics, Russia, China, Pakistan and India.” Oh wow, I bet he learns all kinds of amazing soul-deep truths about poverty and stuff. There’s something about white man being made to eat sheep’s brain. How exotic!
- white man does something unremarkable and trivial.
- white woman shits out some useless drivel “set against the fascinating backdrop of modern China.”
- white woman and white man do boring shit.
- white woman travels to India. Having learned fuck-all about her destination, she is surprised at “signs that life here is less Westernized than she’d counted on.” Oh man, she’s so culturally sensitive!
- white men do useless shit nobody should give a shit about, but many shits are given because, dude, white men! They are the most important people in the world, didn’t you know.
- white man in New Mexico.
I haven’t looked closely at the rest, but I’d be very surprised if they too aren’t of the “Adventures of Whitey the Mighty in Exoticland” flavor.
You may have noticed the pattern: pretty much every single piece of tripe on this list? Are about white westerners and their funky exotic adventures in Exoticland (i.e. any developing country) and the accessories (i.e. people who are not white) that “enrich” and “humanize” their tales or whatever the fuck buzzwords are being used nowadays. I haven’t read any of this because I’d sooner burn them and their writers than read their words, but from the summaries it appears that most of these accounts are of people… not doing anything very much, or doing anything meaningful or interesting. It’s just that they are white, you see, and the adventures of white people are to be prioritized above all others. The lives of Indian women, say, can only be seen through the white-western filter because god forbid they have their own voices, and should they write their own books about their own lives–seen through their own eyes, not a colonialist’s–it probably wouldn’t be voted to the top of Goodreads. There’s a lot of soul-searching and whatever vacuous, empty things white people like to do in these books (again, judging from synopses) and a lot of EXOTICLAND IS SO EXOTIC, MAN being touted. It’s such a nice, Aryan little list.
But enough of my anti-white agenda to start off the new year with.
Ah, fantasy. Guess which title was voted top of the top, best of the best?

Yep, George R. R. Martin “Knights Who Say Fuck” himself. What else. Followed by: book I know nothing about, Patrick Rothfuss’ saga of Gary Studom, a PTerry, a book I know nothing about, a Grossman title I only know about due to its misogyny, an overrated and unfunny piece of shit, the latest installment of Rape Jewels, a Carey title I only know about due to its racefail, Prince of Rape Queues, several books I don’t know much about (though apparently the Jo Walton is nice), Deathless, a book from Mr. Rape the Lesbians, something I don’t know, Kingdom of Incest, and finally a Brooks and a Goodkind. So in toto, we’ve got one Valente, a PTerry, a Jo Walton… and the rest is nothing but shit shit shit shit cocks shit cocks shit. Lots of neckbeard reads there, too: Brooks, Goodkind, Sanderson, Abercrombie, Lawrence, Martin, Rothfuss, Grossman. In fact it’s quite the neckbeard convention with just about every single one of their icons represented–we’re just a Richard Morgan short. Off to a good start, aren’t we?
I’m sure the books I know nothing about are literary masterworks, at least. I guess.

It amuses me that a bunch of these covers look like they could have come from exactly the same series by exactly the same author. Oh YA, do keep sucking and I’ll keep on mocking. And hahaha Cassandra Clare. Truly a genre of lofty, lofty standards. Plagiarists are people too, amirite? At least most of the girls on these covers look alive this time around.

I’m not sure why I even bother with this section. Again, a bunch of covers that look like they come from exactly the same series, exactly the same author, down to the title trends. They probably might as well come from the same author. And, hello there, a Charlaine Harris novel! Does anyone reckon she’s stopped being a racist, misogynistic redneck? Me neither. Jim Butcher in his wonderfully classy form, of course, and from what I hear just as misogynistic as ever. People are still reading Laurell K. Hamilton? Hey, Kim Harrison, stopped being homophobic yet? I don’t suppose any of them learned to write, either. Oh, well. A genre with standards even loftier than YA, really.

To give you an idea: the top book here? Features characters with names like Vishous and Payne. I would rest my fucking case if this weren’t followed by a title penned by one “Damon Suede.” Ahahahahahaha lolcats almighty. May I say that all the bare male chests are really off-putting and borderline vomit-inducing? Can’t cringe away from the monitor fast enough. Amusingly hairless too, seeing that they are all white dudes. Blargh.
What a hive of scum and villainy.
layogenic
January 2, 2012 at 6:59 pm
I’m gonna have to come out of the PTerry closet and say this: Snuff was bad. Really bad. From a complete lack of editing and continuity-checking to just really poorly written characterization…it was bad. So structurally bad that it almost hides the poor white guy’s virtue proven by being slightly less racist than his fellows trope that was slightly worse in this one than the other Vimes books.
“May I say that all the bare male chests are really off-putting and borderline vomit-inducing?”
No, you may not. Manflesh covers is the only thing those books have going for them!
acrackedmoon
January 2, 2012 at 7:27 pm
…:(
I haven’t read a PTerry in years (just estranged I guess, not out of any real reason) and I was hoping Snuff would get me back into the Discworld fold because hey, light fun reads. To be fair, Pratchett’s struggling with Alzheimer’s but… that’s pretty incredibly disappointing. What a shame. What a crying shame.
In that case, my dear sir, I give you Blacker than Black.
Gourmet Neurovore
January 2, 2012 at 8:02 pm
Yeah, Snuff is where Terry hit the wall, I’m afraid. The signs were there in the last couple of books, but that one’s where it all fell apart. Pretty heartbreaking, really. Still, he had a great run before that, at least.
I must say, I’m quite surprised at how high Prince of Thorns got rated. Even with the current grimdark craze, I’d have thought it would be pretty niche.
And am I alone in hoping that having yet another of his ‘deep novels of philosophical reach’ listed as fantasy gives Goodkind a glorious, glorious aneurysm?
acrackedmoon
January 3, 2012 at 5:44 am
No, no you aren’t alone. Death to the Yeard.
layogenic
January 2, 2012 at 8:48 pm
Good grief. Ow. You win.
…in other news. I definitely feel your hate-on for most of the fantasy books (this is the only category about which I feel marginally equipped to discuss, btw) but, to look on the bright side, there is an awful large percentage of women authors on that list. 50%, in fact, unless I’m mis-reading a name or two, which is, dare I say, actually representative of half the world’s population? And while I know you’re not terribly in love with N K Jemison, there at least is a woman of color, and Valente, self-identified queer.
It is by no means a perfect list, but purely in terms of broadening inclusion, it’s a lot better than many I’ve seen this year.
acrackedmoon
January 3, 2012 at 5:43 am
Oh, there’s that. Which would make Jemisin the only writer of color on the list, which is still kind of shite tbh (but Okorafor won the WFA over her, which is great). Not sure about queer writers but, yeah, Valente’s the only one I know is queer.
Lemony
January 2, 2012 at 9:33 pm
I’m curious here, although I don’t want to sound dense, is there any way the travel genre can be redeemed for you? Especially if it is the various of ‘white person goes to foreign country and learns stuff’. I’m just intrigued by the sound of ‘Kosher Chinese’, for example.
I agree with you a lot on everything else. I do need to read up on Martin, because I bought A Game of Thrones on a friend’s recommendation that it is omg the best thing ever and… apparently not. Hmm.
(I hope I don’t come across as a troll or anything, because I’ve read and loved this blog for some time, but I definitely have a habit of phrasing things awkwardly and missing the obvious!)
acrackedmoon
January 3, 2012 at 5:47 am
“White person goes to exoticland, oh man, it’s so exotic, and the white person’s experiences are SO DEEP” seems to make up the majority of the genre, so… no. Couple with outright racist tropes like the sheep’s brains thing being incredibly prevalent: double no.
Martin’s funny. I liked him a lot when he first came out and grimdark was the new thing but, thinking back on it, there’s a lot of things wrong with his stuff–like “Tyrion was made to participate in the gang-rape of his wife but you know what? It’s HIM that suffers the most, not his wife! Because manpain” or “Daenerys: Aryan savior of a bunch of people of color!” His prose isn’t anything to write home about either and his sex scenes are… unfortunate.
Lemony
January 3, 2012 at 5:30 pm
That makes sense, thank you! I was talking about North Korea today and someone went ‘lol but they eat dogs though’… I had no response. (I’m picturing maybe a Indian woman writing about coming to the West to discover that they eat cows and being horrified. Shame it would never be published.)
I… might still give Martin a chance, but then again, if there’s so much better out there…
N
January 3, 2012 at 6:58 pm
The whole “Indian people going to the West and being shocked by their licentious ways!” trope is vastly, VASTLY overused in Bollywood so it’s as hackneyed here as the “white people having epiphanies” one.
Also, not all of us are Hindu (for whom eating beef is taboo), and please, the fact that people outside India eat beef is about as much of a “discovery” to a person with the means to buy a plane ticket as the revelation that people outside Israel eat pork would be to an average Israeli.
As for travelogues about India that aren’t from a white person’s perspective, you could try Pankaj Mishra’s Butter Chicken in Ludhiana, which is about his travels through small-town India – in its own way, it’s as much a strange land to people like me in the big cities of India as said big cities would be to a foreigner. There’s also Don’t Ask Any Old Bloke for Directions, which is more recent and was written by a bureaucrat who chucked up his job and decided to bike the length of the country.
acrackedmoon
January 3, 2012 at 7:13 pm
Not to mention that western media is so dominant everyone everywhere’s bombarded with it non-stop. Doubt anything very much in the west would be shocking to anyone not from it. Apart from the “wow, aspects of this western city are vastly more backward than back home” lulz, anyway.
Thanks for the recs, I’ll look into them.
Lemony
January 3, 2012 at 9:50 pm
Of course! Thank you both for setting me straight, I look like a twat. I need to think more before I speak/type, sorry (it was a silly aside to begin with, although in my head I almost added, ‘in colonial times!’, as well as ‘Hindu’ but I doubt that makes it much better). Thank you for the recommendations, I’ll check them out!
Lal
January 9, 2012 at 3:20 am
Speaking about Indian travelogues by Indians, I’ve been meaning to read [i]Maximum City[/i] for a long time. It’s written by an Indian-born journalist who goes back to live in Bombay after being brought up in New York and finds that things are very different to his childhood memories.
Larry
January 2, 2012 at 11:25 pm
Well, I own 8 and have read 7 of those books. The Morgenstern (The Night Circus book in the fantasy section) was the only one that make my list of notable books. I think it would be interesting to see what you would make of it, as it’s one of those works where the prose is much stronger than the other narrative elements and it’s set in late 19th century European (and a bit of New York) circus circuits. Can’t decide if you may be intrigued by it or find quite a bit to critique (could be both).
Will admit it’s the first time I’ve heard Grossman accused of misogyny, but it’s all too easy for me to miss certain things like that. What elements in particular indicate this? Closest I can recall is the depiction of spoiled upper middle-class late adolescents who seem to live for the screwing and boozing for much of the first novel.
acrackedmoon
January 3, 2012 at 5:50 am
I’ve heard good things about the Morgenstern, so I’m quite interested really. If I do get around to it I may review.
I can’t find the exact reviews I’ve read re: Grossman’s books and the misogyny, but this is one of the things that came up when I googled it. Also here.
Larry
January 3, 2012 at 7:30 am
Hrmm….when I read the Grossman novels, I remember liking the idea of the female protags for being better than Quentin, but when put in the way that the first link describes what happens, I could see where that viewing them as being “strong” despite their shitty backgrounds could also be taken as a sort of myopic view of what is transpiring. I don’t think of his works as actively misogynistic, but I certainly could see in hindsight where there is a casual sexism that is taking place because the female characters are “exceptional” and they have to be shown enduring many multitudes greater hardships than the male characters (Quentin in particular) just to be seen as anywhere near equal.
As for the Morgenstern, the more I think about it, the less I am admiring what she did in her first novel. I recall the prose, but the themes and characterizations seem less and less each time I think about them, but I seem to be in the minority opinion on this.
James Oliver (@DazedBastard)
January 3, 2012 at 2:45 am
The Night Circus, looking magnificently out of place alongside the thickest and blandest of the genre, was actually pretty good. Characterization is thin no matter the character, primary or secondary or random extra, and the romance aspect was rather poor–a combination of late introduction and little time spent exploring it. However, the prose was delightful and I enjoyed the book despite its flaws.
Masterpiece? No. Better than most of the other shit listed next to it? Very much so.
just1fy
January 3, 2012 at 3:40 am
I’m suprised Fifty Shades of Grey didn’t get special mention. Having a book based on Twilight fanfiction being in the top five really makes your case for you.
That being said, I am now going to check out Deathless on your recommendation. =)
acrackedmoon
January 3, 2012 at 5:51 am
Wow, that’s what it is? That’s… awful.
Some people’ve been uncomfortable with the portrayal of Russian culture in Deathless btw, but I’m not Russian so I can’t really speak on it.
Ariel Taylor (@arielttaylor)
January 3, 2012 at 4:06 am
When I was a teenager all I read was fantasy/sci-fi, but I never noticed that every single book with a human (or elf) on it was white or at least looked ambiguous but not too ambiguous that you might think they could be black. I went to Books-a-Million one day and decided to buy the books with black people on the cover from the Teen/YA section. Yeah, I only left with one book that day. ONE BOOK! And it wasn’t even halfway decent.
My mom would sometimes buy me bargain books written by black people from the PX. They were all either faux-hip teen books or religious books or both. I never cracked a single one open.
This post just proves my hypothesis that mainstream black (and other non-white) writers really don’t exist! Unless they write about race.
acrackedmoon
January 3, 2012 at 5:53 am
Oh, Jemisin’s black (and her main characters are generally not white, except when they are white), but AFAIK that’s about it for color in the top fantasy list.
N
January 3, 2012 at 1:33 pm
I’m probably in a minority of one re: the Morgenstern, but honestly, it’s rather a damp squib. She’s better at bringing places to life than people (it’s a toss-up as to what is weaker here, the characterisation of the main protagonists or the plot). Overall, I think this would have been a more interesting story if it focused on some of the supporting characters instead of Marco and Celia.
And I do admit to having an eyeroll at the male protagonist’s acquiring a girlfriend as a teenager while the female protagonist remains celibate (that old trope, again? though I suppose it’s not as bad as it could be) and have not quite sorted out how I feel about the characters of colour and the way the narrative treats them (a Japanese contortionist and the half-Indian owner of the circus, to be exact).
acrackedmoon
January 3, 2012 at 1:52 pm
HMMMMMM. I’m now a little leery, especially for that last bit re: characters of color.
N
January 3, 2012 at 3:51 pm
Oh, I’d urge you to read it before you make up your mind on the subject – it’s only my personal view and to be honest the book was so insipid I’ve forgotten most of it in the months since I read it (as a consequence, I’m not even sure whether my gripes are valid or Morgenstern sucks at writing ALL characters and not just those of colour).
N
January 3, 2012 at 1:37 pm
Oh, and re Pratchett, too bad about Snuff. I rather enjoy his Witches series and Tiffany Aching, the man was capable of writing non-sausagefest stuff rather well back in the day.
Other than that and the Morgenstern (the next Harry Potter, my foot), there are no surprises at all on this list. Crap YA, paranormal romance and white people having epiphanies/adventures when plunked among non-white people – sounds depressingly standard for goodreads.
acrackedmoon
January 3, 2012 at 1:51 pm
Yeah, I always liked the witches books (if not specifically Tiffany). Maskerade is great. Look guys, a girl who is not thin! And who is not body-shamed by the narrative! What miracle.
That’d put me off, not on. :p
Radu Eugen Romaniuc (@rreugen)
January 3, 2012 at 8:06 pm
Hello.
Regarding the travel genre.
Reading through your commentary my (or one of the) first thought was, well, what do you actually want? The whole western civilization is a big travel club. The people who when they come to your country are called Expats, while you will always be an immigrant.
But. If you ever feel like reading a travel book about one of those exotic places, you can try Ilf and Petrov’s account of their travel through 1930′s USA. Funnier than Pratchett.
Nonny Morgan
January 4, 2012 at 3:29 am
Glancing over the urban fantasy list, I’ll mention that Blood Challenge by Eileen Wilks has an Asian American protagonist. Being that I’m white, it might be that there are things I missed, but I’ve heard her work as generally spoken well of by people of color, and I don’t recall anything blatantly out there. She’s definitely good on characterization of women characters, as her women are equal of the heroes rather than being devalued for the sake of making the heroes more “heroic” or some BS.
M Caliban
January 6, 2012 at 11:55 pm
Sanderson is a neckbeard? Is this just because he took over the Wheel of Fail, or is there neckbeard qualities in his original work? I ask because he always struck me as an anti-neckbeard.
acrackedmoon
January 7, 2012 at 6:09 am
He’s a neckbeard favorite. He’s also more than a little homophobic. And, yeah, he’s finishing the WoT books so I’m hard-pressed to think very well of him. He even defended Jordan’s sexism, and by that point he comes off as a total turd.
James Oliver (@DazedBastard)
January 7, 2012 at 7:02 am
Speaking of white men and travels, I was just pointed towards this gem! A bit of a blast from the past from one of the genre’s favorite bloggers.
acrackedmoon
January 7, 2012 at 9:05 am
Holy.
I always thought Pat was a bit of a douche but that’s a whole new level of douche.
James Palmer
January 7, 2012 at 10:17 am
It’s the jocularity that gets me in bad travel writing; what merry japes we have in foreign lands! (That said, nothing will ever diminish my love for “A Short Walk in the Hindu Kush,” but that’s a genuinely hilarious book, mostly at Newby’s own expense.) The travel or partially-travel books I’ve liked most recently have been Colin Thubron’s “To A Mountain in Tibet,” Elif Batuman’s “The Possessed,” Peter Hessler’s “Country Driving,” and Rory Stewart’s “The Places Inbetween.” (Something occurs to me; many of the recent travel books by women I can think of offhand involve *living* in a place rather than travelling *through* it – Charlotte Hobson’s “Black Earth City” and Louisa Waugh’s “Hearing Birds Fly” f’instance.)
On the travel writing by non-Westerners front, there’s Ma Jian’s “Red Dust” (Gao Xingjian’s “Soul Mountain” too, it’s supposedly a novel but pretty autobiographical.”) Those both involve travel within their own country, but the west of China is effectively a foreign land for most Chinese. Also Pankaj Mishra’s books are good, as mentioned above, though “Butter Chicken in Ludhiana” is a bit divisive when it comes to treatment of other Indians – I’d start with “The Buddha in the World”. And, of course, there’s Naipaul, who hates everyone, especially blacks, but is still a genius – a horrible genius, but still. There’s some “I went to America” books in Chinese (untranslated) but none of them are very good. Historically, there’s a whole fascinating genre of travel writing about China by Japanese after the “closed country” policy was lifted – Joshua Fogel wrote a good book about it – and a lot of Southern Song stuff.
When it comes to utterlyhorrifyingohgodmyeyes treatments of other countries, I would pay good money to see a review of “The Hangover II” here.
saajanpatel
January 7, 2012 at 6:03 pm
Night Circus and Heroes I liked. The former suffers from lack of characterization and the latter has issues but is by far a major improvement on previous works.
I still need to read Deathless, but decided to get Kindle versions of Kiernan’s shorts (was saving for hardcover) and Myths of Origin.
One thing I’d be curious to see is travelogues by more minorities. There was a time when many African-Americans in the US were – according to our own media at least – moving to Asian countries because they felt there was less racism.
acrackedmoon
January 7, 2012 at 8:29 pm
Ehhhh. I hope not, because that’s not really the case–certainly not in Southeast and East Asian. :/
saajanpatel
January 7, 2012 at 8:55 pm
Yeah, I was surprised by the idea as well. (Unfortunately.)
Sean Wills (@seanwillsalt)
January 8, 2012 at 9:06 am
I had trouble even getting through that ‘Plane of Sexuality’ shit. I mean…
“This face belongs to that social anomaly, the gay air hostess. The gay air hostess is another beast entirely separate from real life, it’s emasculated, yet bizarrely has a position of power in that this creature, clearly wishing it was a female getting a good ride from behind, can tell bigger more ostensibly male types what to do.”
OKAY THEN.
All of the comments saying ‘You’re so brave to have put this back up!’ are a bit nausea-inducing.
(Oh, and the writing is terrible. There’s a reason why most writers don’t just sprinkle their sentences with commas, dude.)
acrackedmoon
January 8, 2012 at 10:29 am
People defending Macken is… awful. Just ugh. Oh no, he was going to delete his twitter! Who gives a shit? The guy’s some c-rate actor, not a political activist.
saajanpatel
January 8, 2012 at 4:41 pm
“The guy’s some c-rate actor, not a political activist.”
This. I don’t even read Naipul after finding out what a shit-bag he is, and one can argue he does bring something serious to literature.
Gourmet Neurovore
February 21, 2012 at 2:25 pm
What’s wrong with Naipul? I ask out of curiosity/lack of knowledge, not disbelief, by the way.
saajanpatel
February 21, 2012 at 11:48 am
This seemed interesting given past discussion, it is a travelogue of a Japanese man to India:
http://www.blaft.com/view_details.php?id=30
acrackedmoon
February 21, 2012 at 1:22 pm
That intrigues me greatly.
Inverarity Pynchon
February 21, 2012 at 6:44 pm
For one thing, he’s a raging misogynist: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jun/02/vs-naipaul-jane-austen-women-writers
Also, I understand his books are pretty racist; he’s from Trinidad and of Indian descent, and apparently writes very derogatorily about Muslims and Afro-Trinidadians. (I haven’t read his books, but have been told this by people who have.)
saajanpatel
February 21, 2012 at 11:00 pm
Yeah, there have been accusations of abuse from his former partners as well – verbal/emotional if nothing else. The testimony is pretty damning.
What he wrote about Afro-Trinidadians is just outright beyond the pale, I’d have to find the exact quote but it was race theory and slavery apologia wrapped up into one.
There’s also his endless whining about not being respected enough.
Gourmet Neurovore
February 23, 2012 at 9:46 pm
Ayup, that’s pretty hideous. Ta for the info, folks.
Christine Materi
May 16, 2012 at 12:28 pm
I was interested to see Blackveil in the fantasy section, because I just found your blog and have been wondering what you would think about that series. It’s pretty thoroughly white, but it has several good female characters including the protagonist.
It’s not necessarily a literary masterpiece, but in my opinion it’s definitely one of the better fantasy series out there.